I was quite shocked whilst reading Mr McLarons “Ten Search engine optimization Myths and Facts” as I find them being a personal attack towards me, defacing and bad mouthing my theories, and misguiding a net-community who need people to trust, since they are not very net-savy.

These 10 mythical points have no substantial backing, but are based on personal ideas and arguments, there is no proof in the pudding, so to speak, that those 10 points are myths, especially those considering Meta Data, Hyper Linking, Sex Sells, etc…

Fact is, I have had more experience on the net than most people who have been commenting and making fun of my site. Also, how can people just proclaim myths without scientific and net-based proof?

I have probably made more money with my donations-system during the last 2 weeks than certain people by selling their questionable product. Also, in comparison to those self proclaimed SEO pro’s I have been presenting my ideas (W-TEP) and theories multiple times, publicly, how often have these pro’s done it?

It is a fact that Meta data is one of the core factors to get traffic increased on your site. Also, SEX SELLS, this theory is ancient by now, and so common, it’s simple…92% of web traffic is based on Sex related searches and content, now that’s HUGE! Also all images carry metadata which gets picked up by search engines just because one cannot see that physically doesn’t mean it doesn’t exits, simple!

I’m a little disappointed; net-ettique is definitely an issue in this society. There is constant backstabbing going on, bickering, fighting, it’s like a net-cyberwar!